duck2000 chat 7/6/2011 ON ANOTHER SITE

duck2000 chat 7/6/2011 ON ANOTHER SITE

9:48 AM [duck2000] do we agree that the un mission for iraq is under unami
9:48 AM [JBowhunter] yup.
9:49 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} yes
9:49 AM [duck2000] do we agree that melkert is the head dog running that mission
9:49 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} yes
9:49 AM [JBowhunter] y
9:49 AM [Fabio] oh heck yes
9:49 AM [duck2000] do we agree that the un sanctions are under unami
9:49 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} bout time you spoke Fabio
99:50 AM [JBowhunter] including CH 7?
9:50 AM [duck2000] yes including chapter 7
9:50 AM [duck2000] do we agree
9:50 AM [JBowhunter] i would agree.
9:50 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} well if un sanctions are under unami....chpt 7 would have to be ...my assumption
9:50 AM [Fabio] Mama I've asked questions that weren't answered but that's ok
9:51 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} ask them again!
9:51 AM [duck2000] please do didnt mean to ignore
9:51 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} [Fabio] What I'm asking is with the economic crisis in europe, wouldn't you think that those countries have invested in dinar as well and the war and would want a favorable rv to help them out?
9:51 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} was that it?
9:51 AM [Fabio] yes
9:52 AM [duck2000] have no idea
9:52 AM [duck2000] but an r/v would help the world economy
9:52 AM [duck2000] hence helping the euro zone
9:52 AM [JBowhunter] well wouldn't increased strength in us dolllar help out euro zone as well.?
9:52 AM [Fabio] but duck in on a roll so don't stop. am learning good thinking things
9:52 AM [duck2000] but that would only be temperary
9:52 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} im glad you asked though Fabio
9:52 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} i liked the question
9:53 AM [JBowhunter] sure would be a definite stimulus....a real stimulus that would actually work for the world economy.
9:53 AM [duck2000] no the u.s dollar stands alone in that regaurd beacuse the euro zone stands alone
9:54 AM [duck2000] hence the euro is all ways against the dollar in the trading sessions
9:54 AM [duck2000] now back to my thoughts
9:54 AM [JBowhunter] please do.
9:54 AM [duck2000] can we look at the unami and see if the sanctions are under there?
9:55 AM [duck2000] look at the unsc site
9:55 AM [duck2000] go to the meetings section
9:55 AM [duck2000] find 2011
9:55 AM [duck2000] click it
9:55 AM [duck2000] read what the unsc has said on unami
9:56 AM [duck2000] dont take my word for it
9:56 AM [duck2000] go back as far as you like
9:56 AM [duck2000] if you conclude that the unami and tha sanctions are one in the same
9:57 AM [duck2000] and are under the same umbrella
9:57 AM [duck2000] and that melkert is in charge of said sanctions to the un
9:58 AM [duck2000] then we have a small problem
99:59 AM [cajunmama] whats the small problem
10:00 AM [duck2000] what did the unsc say about the dfi funds last month ?
10:00 AM [w8tin] done deal as i recall...dfi fund ended...all funds of iraq in their control but protected by usa....right?
10:01 AM [duck2000] no protection by U.S
10:01 AM [duck2000] but they did clearly say they expired june 30th 2011
10:01 AM [duck2000] and it was underlined
10:01 AM [w8tin] oh wow..i thought us was protecting the funds they had in us...sorry..guess i misunderstood...yikes - back to my corner
110:02 AM [duck2000] we have no dfi funds in the u.s any more
10:02 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} let me paste this in here then so we can disect this
10:02 AM [duck2000] we have four other accounts but thats another story
10:02 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} i think this is where everyone (including me is confused)
10:02 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} Iraq retains some protections under an American executive order, which was signed by President George W. Bush in 2003 and extended under President Barack Obama, most recently through May 20, 2012. Unlike the former U.N. immunities, however, the American protection does not cover Iraqi funds held outside the U.S.
10:02 AM [duck2000] bingo
10:03 AM [duck2000] dfi isnt in our hands any more
10:03 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} so what IS
10:03 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} I guess should be the question
10:03 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} because something is...the question is what
10:03 AM [duck2000] the four remaining accounts only
10:03 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} which are:
10:03 AM [duck2000] but thaTS not the point i am makeing
10:03 AM [duck2000] they dont matter
10:03 AM [JBowhunter] that is why we need to have our "trainers" over there yet.
10:03 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} can you pretend and make it a point?
110:04 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} PRETENNNND
10:04 AM [JBowhunter] so finish your point, then we can pretennnnnd.
10:05 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} ohhh i was so close
10:05 AM [duck2000] the protection was granted for a year they didnt use all of the year they being iraq has copleat controll of there dfi
10:05 AM [cajunmama] Will someone please copy this chat
10:11 AM [duck2000] so to wrap it up if dfi went away as stated june 30 20011
10:11 AM [duck2000] 2011
10:11 AM [duck2000] and we know unami goes away july31st 2011
10:11 AM [charlaanne] yes, indeedey!!!!
10:11 AM {\"CacklingGristlyOldHen\"} Sanctions are measures designed to compel governments or political factions to comply with the requirements established by the Security Council when those measures are considered to be necessary to the maintenance of international peace and security. They are intended to apply pressure on those governments or political factions. This pressure is felt in two different situations: When sanctions are adopted (and sometimes even before they are adopted) and when they are implemented effectively.
10:11 AM [duck2000] and there is a meeting on the 28th of july
10:12 AM [Fabio] keep coming, looking good!!
10:12 AM [charlaanne] BINGO!
10:12 AM [duck2000] and it clearly says adoptins
10:12 AM [duck2000] do we agree that the remaining sanctions have to be gone before the end of this month
10:12 AM [charlaanne] so they are not simply sayin VOTE, they are saying ADOPT
10:13 AM [sassy] omg
10:13 AM [Fabio] yes, go on!!!
10:13 AM [duck2000] then if this all is true as i have said our r/v day is the 28th of this month
10:13 AM [charlaanne] you said it, you said it!!!!!!!!!!
10:14 AM [duck2000] all 15 members will be called to do an adoption

I vote we add a word filter to change "MamaEhrhardt" name to "CacklingGristlyOldHen" that is really a much more fitting name for her, and all I came up with after reading this useless babble.

I see your still pushy and ill mannered:

10:03 AM [MamaEhrhardt] can you pretend and make it a point?
110:04 AM [MamaEhrhardt] PRETENNNND

Thank you Todd for putting the word filter to change "MamaEhrhardt" into "CacklingGristlyOldHen" that is the most fitting ID for her and I found the perfect picture of her!!!

HAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I LOVE it!